Agoric’s testnet. My experience.

Over the past 2 years, I have participated in many testnets, so I have something to compare and draw any conclusions. In my opinion, during the testnet process, you can easily understand the attitude of developers to the project. I’m not trying to compare projects with each other, because many of them are fundamentally different, I just want to note in which testnet I was comfortable working with the project team and with other validators. Among such projects in my experience were: Mina protocol, Nucypher, Near, Solana, Akash, and of course Agoric! You can view the information about the testnet on this page:

Here’s how the Agoric testnet differs from other projects for the better:

  1. Detailed instructions to understand the task, but not so much that it is performed by people who are completely unfamiliar with working in ubuntu and node’s validation. I often met in other testnet, where the most detailed instructions were given — people participated who did not understand what they were doing. I think this is too much, because one of the main tasks of the testnet is to choose validators for the mainnet, and such validators must be competent.

In total, in less than 2 phases, I launched a validator, wrote a couple of articles, installed several monitoring programs, launched a sentry node, performed several network updates, including a sudden one, in the middle of the night :-D. And there are still 3 phases ahead, more challenging and interesting tasks. That’s what Agoric is — constantly achieving new goals and developing.




Blockchain enthusiast

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store